[TiG] The Irish Guard - UK & Irish PC Gaming Clan & Gaming Community

Information and Help => Complaints => Topic started by: [TiG]Shano on September 17, 2005, 04:23:18 PM

Title: 32 man server
Post by: [TiG]Shano on September 17, 2005, 04:23:18 PM

was on 64 and it is unreal how many n00bs there are there was teamkilling for choppers/blawk hawks tanks everything and  was really annoying.but when 32 there will b less n00bs and everything so can we have a 40 man server or 32? i myself think it b alot better and there was soo much lag 2day on 64.

Title: 32 man server
Post by: [TiG]Lucutus on September 17, 2005, 04:50:17 PM

64 played fine for me today.

At least it's being used again.

No point hosting a server running empty.

Title: 32 man server
Post by: [TiG]Shano on September 17, 2005, 06:35:24 PM

Quote from: [TiG]Lucutus

At least it's being used again.

No point hosting a server running empty.

ture

Title: 32 man server
Post by: PJ= on September 17, 2005, 06:43:08 PM

"ture" lol

Title: 32 man server
Post by: =Warmonger= on September 20, 2005, 10:41:58 PM

well we all know that Shano gets an 'A' is his spelling :P

Title: 32 man server
Post by: [TiG]Shano on September 21, 2005, 08:54:59 AM

Quote from: [TiG]=Warmonger=

well we all know that Shano gets an 'A' is his spelling :P

yeah we do A+ tbh:P

Title: dublin
Post by: Nick_Nack on September 22, 2005, 10:20:40 PM

cmon leave him off he is from .....DUBLIN! adn he might be a DUBLIN SCUMBAG!!! jk jk but ya i think shano is right i like 32 to man servers aswell and i think ye should change the map cycle to city or others like fu she pass adn  city sumthing like taht.

Title: 32 man server
Post by: [TiG]Shano on September 23, 2005, 10:10:29 PM

DUBLIN SCUMBAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u really are looking for  a  ass kicking in bf2 biotchhhhhhhhh:P

Title: 32 man server
Post by: tig.bf2|wypoor on September 24, 2005, 06:39:47 AM

I agreed with Shano. Now, when we have only 64 slot server and always empty 16 slots I must playing on some polish and germans servers with n00bs. Now when my connect finaly working corectly and I wanna play on TiG server I can't - cos I don't like 64 players - is to much for PC and it is to big lottery. I thinking that on 64 servers happy are only stats makers. So, let's kill this 64s bastard! ;)

Title: ya i agree
Post by: Nick_Nack on September 25, 2005, 02:39:05 PM

ya i agree but only cos i like 32 man or a 40 man sever is better then 64 or u could make the 16 player a 32 man adn make the 64 man a 32 man aswell so then it would be the same to 64 and the old 16 server will get players then adn how bad is your pc wypoor

Title: 32 man server
Post by: tig.bf2|wypoor on September 25, 2005, 02:53:19 PM

Is not to bad, I got 2,19 GHz Athlon, 1 GB RAM, NForce 2 and GF 6800 but u know, playing on 64 server u got more problems with connection. I think that is some like paranoia ;)

Title: 32 man server
Post by: [TiG]Molc on September 25, 2005, 06:37:43 PM

Thing is (as Luc said) the server was bumped down to a 32 and it was empty. An empty server is still worse to play on than a full 64...

The SAS 32 seems to be busy - wonder how they manage it.