« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: 32 man server  (Read 784 times)

[TiG]Shano

  • TiG Member
  • Needs a life
  • *****
  • Posts: 1072
32 man server
« on: September 17, 2005, 04:23:18 PM »
was on 64 and it is unreal how many n00bs there are there was teamkilling for choppers/blawk hawks tanks everything and  was really annoying.but when 32 there will b less n00bs and everything so can we have a 40 man server or 32? i myself think it b alot better and there was soo much lag 2day on 64.
Logged

[TiG]Lucutus

  • Needs a life
  • *****
  • Posts: 2650
32 man server
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2005, 04:50:17 PM »
64 played fine for me today.

At least it's being used again.

No point hosting a server running empty.
Logged

[TiG]Shano

  • TiG Member
  • Needs a life
  • *****
  • Posts: 1072
32 man server
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2005, 06:35:24 PM »
Quote from: [TiG]Lucutus


At least it's being used again.

No point hosting a server running empty.


ture
Logged

PJ=

  • Guest
32 man server
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2005, 06:43:08 PM »
"ture" lol
Logged

=Warmonger=

  • Guest
32 man server
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2005, 10:41:58 PM »
well we all know that Shano gets an 'A' is his spelling :P
Logged

[TiG]Shano

  • TiG Member
  • Needs a life
  • *****
  • Posts: 1072
32 man server
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2005, 08:54:59 AM »
Quote from: [TiG]=Warmonger=
well we all know that Shano gets an 'A' is his spelling :P
yeah we do A+ tbh:P
Logged

Nick_Nack

  • Guest
dublin
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2005, 10:20:40 PM »
cmon leave him off he is from .....DUBLIN! adn he might be a DUBLIN SCUMBAG!!! jk jk but ya i think shano is right i like 32 to man servers aswell and i think ye should change the map cycle to city or others like fu she pass adn  city sumthing like taht.
Logged

[TiG]Shano

  • TiG Member
  • Needs a life
  • *****
  • Posts: 1072
32 man server
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2005, 10:10:29 PM »
DUBLIN SCUMBAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u really are looking for  a  ass kicking in bf2 biotchhhhhhhhh:P
Logged

tig.bf2|wypoor

  • Guest
32 man server
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2005, 06:39:47 AM »
I agreed with Shano. Now, when we have only 64 slot server and always empty 16 slots I must playing on some polish and germans servers with n00bs. Now when my connect finaly working corectly and I wanna play on TiG server I can't - cos I don't like 64 players - is to much for PC and it is to big lottery. I thinking that on 64 servers happy are only stats makers. So, let's kill this 64s bastard! ;)
Logged

Nick_Nack

  • Guest
ya i agree
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2005, 02:39:05 PM »
ya i agree but only cos i like 32 man or a 40 man sever is better then 64 or u could make the 16 player a 32 man adn make the 64 man a 32 man aswell so then it would be the same to 64 and the old 16 server will get players then adn how bad is your pc wypoor
Logged

tig.bf2|wypoor

  • Guest
32 man server
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2005, 02:53:19 PM »
Is not to bad, I got 2,19 GHz Athlon, 1 GB RAM, NForce 2 and GF 6800 but u know, playing on 64 server u got more problems with connection. I think that is some like paranoia ;)
Logged

[TiG]Molc

  • TiG Member
  • Needs a life
  • *****
  • Posts: 1210
    • http://molc.nonado.net
32 man server
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2005, 06:37:43 PM »
Thing is (as Luc said) the server was bumped down to a 32 and it was empty. An empty server is still worse to play on than a full 64...

The SAS 32 seems to be busy - wonder how they manage it.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
 
TinyPortal © 2005-2017